Logo
UpTrust
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQLog InSign Up
Log InSign Up
QuestionsEventsGroupsFAQ
UpTrustUpTrust

Social media built on trust and credibility. Where thoughtful contributions rise to the top.

Get Started

Sign UpLog In

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceDMCA
© 2026 UpTrust. All rights reserved.

monetary policy

  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Has crypto delivered on any of its promises?: The Story

    $69,000. Then $16,000. Then $73,000. Bitcoin’s price chart looks like a heart monitor for someone who should not still be alive — and the patient keeps getting out of bed....
    cryptocurrency
    bitcoin
    monetary policy
    financial regulation
    remittances
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Why does wealth keep concentrating?: Austrian school

    The Sunday heist On March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve cut rates to zero and announced unlimited quantitative easing. Within two years, the balance sheet swelled from $4.2 trillion to $9 trillion. The S&P rose 40 percent. Home prices rose 34 percent....
    economics
    monetary policy
    income inequality
    austrian economics
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    Why does wealth keep concentrating?: Chicago school

    The crisis they forgot In 1979, inflation was 13.3 percent. Unemployment hit 7.5. Mortgage rates climbed past 12. The economy Volcker inherited was not a victim of deregulation — deregulation had barely started....
    economics
    public policy
    monetary policy
    political economy
    income inequality and wealth concentration
    Comments
    0
  • UpTrust AdminSA•...

    If everyone got a basic income, would they flourish or check out?: Austrian school

    The Sunday that changed everything August 15, 1971. Nixon suspended dollar-to-gold convertibility. Sunday evening. Television address. No consultation with the IMF. He called it temporary. It has been fifty-five years....
    monetary policy
    political economy
    universal basic income
    austrian school economics
    Comments
    0
  • as seen on tv avatar

    Bitcoin is now synthetically created, through options, derivatives, & ETF. Does that mean it’s endless, just like all the US dollars? Legend has it that Satoshi Nakamoto (creator of the Bitcoin universe) decreed there can only be 21 million bitcoins ever, until the end of time. Stop laughing – people actually believe this. It underpins the entire idea that Bitcoin is valuable and could be worth $100,000 each or $1 million each. Or worth whatever someone wakes up tomorrow and decides for themselves.

    Just 21 million? Not so fast. Yahoo Personal Finance (link below, seldom known for deep insights into money) has come to a startling and simple conclusion: We – the holders and traders of Bitcoin – can make the supply infinite. We are creating new “synthetic” Bitcoins with all the usual Wall Street approved chicanery: Bitcoin exchange trade funds, futures, swaps, derivatives. And the big enchilada – cryptocurrency banks which keep your Bitcoin in a "safe" wallet while lending Bitcoin to somebody else doesn't have any. This what banks do with your checking and savings accounts, which creates "synthetic dollars", too.

    Are your eyes glazing over yet?

    The amount of US dollars roaming the world in the wild at any given moment is a matter of debate. But it’s huge, and it’s always growing. Because of the american government keeps printing more, issuing treasury bills and all of the clever Wall Street hustles noted. Nobody pretends the US dollar is in any way fixed in quantity. Dollar Inflation seems to be INFINITE. Reality check: America bought Alaska for just $7 million. Don’t try and figure out what it’s worth using one of those ridiculous online “inflation calculators”. They say it’s just $140 million, and they are hysterically wrong. Even without the buildings, roads and ports – just the land alone – Alaska is worth $3.5 TRILLION ($8,375 avg per acre, multiplied by 425 million acres).

    Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong (COIN, listed on the New York Stock Exchange, market cap $50 billion +/-) is desperate to get the 2026 Clarity bill passed. This is understandable - he helped write it. And Mr. Armstrong has said he’d rather have no bill at all, rather than “a bad one”. The Clarity bill exempts Bitcoin (and every other crypto currency) from regulation like stocks.

    Just imagine the gazillions of synthetic Bitcoins that will come pouring out these companies if they get their way. That could make the US dollar look like the safest bet.

    I’m just sayin’ . . .

    Bitcoin's 'Infinite' Paper Supply — Not Wall Street — Is The Real Problem, Says Analyst

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoins-infinite-paper-supply-not-203126798.html
    as seen on tv•...
    the expansion of US dollar supply (fiat), bitcoin, US treasuries, and corporate debt obligations is a form of inflation.  but i'm not advocating deflation....
    cryptocurrency
    inflation
    monetary policy
    macroeconomics
    Comments
    0
  • as seen on tv avatar

    Photo below - remember this? Ask your mom or dad about it, if you were still a kid 20 years ago.

    The places where you and I keep our money are NOT a private investment banks. We have presumably safe checking and savings deposits at places like Chase, Bank of America, Citibank, Wells Fargo. However, all of those have been fined or placed under government restrictions for violations and unsafe practices at some point recently. Still, this as safe as it gets for ordinary customers like us.

    But these institutions – and dozens of others – have mirror operations: Investment Banking. If some guy with a lot of money and doesn’t like what Bank of America pays as interest on a savings account, they can open an investment bank relationship. Returns will be higher. So will risks, since investment banks shower money on stuff which some regulators frown at. Those investment banks have waaaay different rules, and the money spigot – both in and out – can be turned off overnight. That’s what’s happening right now. (see link below)

    “The last time funds blocked investors from getting their money back, Bear Stearns collapsed 6 months later” (direct quote from George Noble). This was, of course 2007-2008. But the crisis didn’t stop there. Practically every money center bank in America with FDIC insured deposits quickly ran into trouble. The government stepped in (President Bush) and started bailing everyone out – real banks, investment banks, wall street brokerages, Fannie Mae . . . even General Motors.

    This bailout bonanza became known as TARP, and it cost taxpayers trillions. Historians are divided as to whether this really saved the entire system, or just the most reckless players.

    There is no requirement for the government to rescue anything other than an FDIC insured bank. All the other TARP winners were outside of the orbit of US government obligation. Wall Street and automakers and everyone else who got a big check is probably still grateful.

    So here we are again. Big shots who have uninsured deposits at risky institutions are demanding their money back. The investment bank managers are saying no. Blackrock/HPS Corporate Lending halted withdrawals when clients tried to withdraw $1.2 billion almost overnight. This is called a “bank run”, when clients become panicked that they will NEVER get their money back, and they run as fast as they can to the exit.

    The current gulf war, skyrocketing oil prices, AI job impacts, and a possible global recession are triggering this bank run. Just like the collapse of the risky mortgage lending business did in 2007.

    I’m conflicted at this point. Should I root for another nationwide financial bailout to save everyone, because everyone is too big to fail, not just a handful of money center banks? If that happens the national debt is going to the moon. If we refuse to bail out all the brain-dead bad investment banks and corporations, would that really risk the survival of legitimate banks which are regulated by at least 4 government agencies?

    And does anyone really trust the Trump administration to (first) make a careful review of the facts and risks, and (then) chart a prudent course of action? This is the White House which recently showered lobster tails, sushi prep tables, and ice cream machines on the Pentagon because it didn’t know what else to do with unspent defense money.

    I’m just sayin’ . . .

    Veteran fund manager George Noble warns that a private credit crisis may be unfolding in real time

    Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 - Wikipedia

    https://finance.yahoo.com/news/veteran-fund-manager-george-noble-093001508.html
    as seen on tv•...
    assets are only worth something as long as people believe they are worth something.  banks provide a presumably vital service to allow people to get paid and consume. that probably isn't true about bitcoin, or gold coins, or even stock brokerages....
    cryptocurrency
    economics
    monetary policy
    insurance
    banking
    Comments
    0
  • as seen on tv•...

    Raise your hand if you think the Fed should start raising interest rates again.

    Photo above - The Federal Reserve Board of governors doesn't HAVE to release the minutes of their past meetings, but occasionally they do so anyway. The good news: Inflation last month dropped to 2.4%, from a high of 11% at the end of the Biden presidency....
    economics
    public policy
    inflation
    monetary policy
    central banking
    Comments
    0
  • Philip avatar

    Partisan Politics: The Ultimate Smokescreen? The Left demonizes the Right. The Right demonizes the Left. The media, for the most part, only stokes this rivalry. Both sides are up in arms, believing that they have to keep the other side from winning at all costs.

    Meanwhile, governments and central banks everywhere keep issuing more money, devaluing its purchasing power in the process (causing inflation). They do this to finance wars, to bail out banks, to fund massive bureaucracies and social programs and/or to stimulate the economy. They do this regardless of which party is in power.

    And they do it because they can. Because our money used to be backed by gold or other scarce commodities, now it’s backed by nothing. Therefore its supply can be inflated at will (and this is what the original meaning of the word inflation alludes to).

    I don’t think they do it out of malice. They likely often have the best intentions, and entire economic theories have been created and are espoused by Nobel-winning economists and academics to justify why they do it. But at the end of the day, the power to issue money out of thin air is just too great for any person or group to wield responsibly. It inevitably gets misused and abused.

    And it has disastrous consequences. Most people around the world are getting poorer in real terms, regardless of how hard they work, because their purchasing power is being inexorably eroded. And most people don’t fully realize that this is what’s happening. They intuit that something’s fundamentally very wrong, but don’t really know what it is. Stress, depression, anger, frustration and despair run rampant, and are usually misdirected.

    And so governments of every stripe and their central banks keep diluting everyone’s purchasing power, effectively stealing our time and energy. You work to earn money, and the money you earn buys you less and less over time. This isn’t an accident, and it isn’t because of corporate greed, or because illegal immigrants are taking what’s yours. It’s the result of deliberate governmental monetary policy, and it’s a global phenomenon.

    And they get to keep doing this because almost everyone is too busy fighting the other side to even notice or understand that it’s happening.

    Philip•...
    I really appreciate your reply Blake, as well as the question you offered. I think I lean most towards the second option you shared. I don’t think that if governments abandoned inflationary monetary policies, productivity would necessarily take a hit....
    ethics
    economics
    political science
    history
    monetary policy
    Comments
    0
  • Philip avatar

    Partisan Politics: The Ultimate Smokescreen? The Left demonizes the Right. The Right demonizes the Left. The media, for the most part, only stokes this rivalry. Both sides are up in arms, believing that they have to keep the other side from winning at all costs.

    Meanwhile, governments and central banks everywhere keep issuing more money, devaluing its purchasing power in the process (causing inflation). They do this to finance wars, to bail out banks, to fund massive bureaucracies and social programs and/or to stimulate the economy. They do this regardless of which party is in power.

    And they do it because they can. Because our money used to be backed by gold or other scarce commodities, now it’s backed by nothing. Therefore its supply can be inflated at will (and this is what the original meaning of the word inflation alludes to).

    I don’t think they do it out of malice. They likely often have the best intentions, and entire economic theories have been created and are espoused by Nobel-winning economists and academics to justify why they do it. But at the end of the day, the power to issue money out of thin air is just too great for any person or group to wield responsibly. It inevitably gets misused and abused.

    And it has disastrous consequences. Most people around the world are getting poorer in real terms, regardless of how hard they work, because their purchasing power is being inexorably eroded. And most people don’t fully realize that this is what’s happening. They intuit that something’s fundamentally very wrong, but don’t really know what it is. Stress, depression, anger, frustration and despair run rampant, and are usually misdirected.

    And so governments of every stripe and their central banks keep diluting everyone’s purchasing power, effectively stealing our time and energy. You work to earn money, and the money you earn buys you less and less over time. This isn’t an accident, and it isn’t because of corporate greed, or because illegal immigrants are taking what’s yours. It’s the result of deliberate governmental monetary policy, and it’s a global phenomenon.

    And they get to keep doing this because almost everyone is too busy fighting the other side to even notice or understand that it’s happening.

    blakeSA•...
    Object-level: I agree that the governments get a whole bunch of extra money via inflationary monetary policy. I agree people don’t seem to be aware of this, and that sucks....
    cryptocurrency
    economics
    productivity
    monetary policy
    global politics
    government policy
    public awareness
    gdp growth
    Comments
    0
  • Philip avatar

    Partisan Politics: The Ultimate Smokescreen? The Left demonizes the Right. The Right demonizes the Left. The media, for the most part, only stokes this rivalry. Both sides are up in arms, believing that they have to keep the other side from winning at all costs.

    Meanwhile, governments and central banks everywhere keep issuing more money, devaluing its purchasing power in the process (causing inflation). They do this to finance wars, to bail out banks, to fund massive bureaucracies and social programs and/or to stimulate the economy. They do this regardless of which party is in power.

    And they do it because they can. Because our money used to be backed by gold or other scarce commodities, now it’s backed by nothing. Therefore its supply can be inflated at will (and this is what the original meaning of the word inflation alludes to).

    I don’t think they do it out of malice. They likely often have the best intentions, and entire economic theories have been created and are espoused by Nobel-winning economists and academics to justify why they do it. But at the end of the day, the power to issue money out of thin air is just too great for any person or group to wield responsibly. It inevitably gets misused and abused.

    And it has disastrous consequences. Most people around the world are getting poorer in real terms, regardless of how hard they work, because their purchasing power is being inexorably eroded. And most people don’t fully realize that this is what’s happening. They intuit that something’s fundamentally very wrong, but don’t really know what it is. Stress, depression, anger, frustration and despair run rampant, and are usually misdirected.

    And so governments of every stripe and their central banks keep diluting everyone’s purchasing power, effectively stealing our time and energy. You work to earn money, and the money you earn buys you less and less over time. This isn’t an accident, and it isn’t because of corporate greed, or because illegal immigrants are taking what’s yours. It’s the result of deliberate governmental monetary policy, and it’s a global phenomenon.

    And they get to keep doing this because almost everyone is too busy fighting the other side to even notice or understand that it’s happening.

    blakeSA•...
    All this sounds pretty right. And on the other hand, when I read The Economist talking about the usefulness of inflationary monetary policy, it seems pretty reasonable, too. I don’t think The Economist is wrapped up in partisan politics....
    economics
    political science
    media studies
    inflation
    monetary policy
    Comments
    0
Loading related tags...